Analysis of Packet Transmission Overhead of IPv4 and IPv6 through Simulation
Nitul Dutta, S R Biradar, Krishna Chakraborty, Md. Abu Safi, Kushal Pokhrel, Shrijana Pradhan, Saswati Bhattacharyee and Kiran Gautam. Article: Analysis of Packet Transmission Overhead of IPv4 and IPv6 through Simulation. IJCA Proceedings on National Conference cum Workshop on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology NCWBCB(2):20-24, May 2014. Full text available. BibTeX
@article{key:article,
author = {Nitul Dutta and S. R. Biradar and Krishna Chakraborty and Md. Abu Safi and Kushal Pokhrel and Shrijana Pradhan and Saswati Bhattacharyee and Kiran Gautam},
title = {Article: Analysis of Packet Transmission Overhead of IPv4 and IPv6 through Simulation},
journal = {IJCA Proceedings on National Conference cum Workshop on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology},
year = {2014},
volume = {NCWBCB},
number = {2},
pages = {20-24},
month = {May},
note = {Full text available}
}
Abstract
Internet Protocol (IP) is becoming a dominant network layer protocol in the current network. Due to some limitations, mainly the shortage of address space in IP version 4 (IPv4), the newer version of the protocol named IPv6 is increasingly getting its popularity. But there is already a huge investment made towards the implementation of IPv4. Also, new applications have started developing using IPv6. So, there is a great confusion among users of IP based network whether to deploy IPv6 or stay back with IPv4. This paper is a general comparative study of both the versions of IP and intended to outline few scenarios that may be considered during the selection of IP version as a network layer protocol. The findings of this work are presented in the form of graphs which focus few positive sides of using IPv4. The advantages of IPv6 over IPv4 are tabulated to realize the benefits of using IPv6 as well. The conclusion drawn from the work carried out may be considered as a basis for the proper selection of the different versions of the protocol.
References
- RFC 791 on "Internet Protocol Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification," September 1981.
- D. Senie, "RFC 3235 on 'Network Address Translator (NAT)-Friendly Application Design Guidelines," January 29th, 2002.
- Introduction to IPv6 http://forums. techarena. in/guides-tutorials/ 1064417. htm
- S. Deering , R. Hinden, "RFC2460 - Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)," Specification December 1998
- http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/IPv6.
- Yi Wang, Shaozhi Ye, Xing Li, "Understanding Current IPv6 Performance: A Measurement Study" Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC 2005)
- Mohiuddin Ahmed, Mohd. Adam Suhaimi, Quazi Shoyweeb, Md. Faisal, Shariq Haseeb, "Evaluating QoS performance of Streaming Video on both IPv4 and IPv6 Protocols", Proceedings of the 2007 Spring Simulation Multiconference vol. 1, pp. 109-116.
- L. Colitti, G. D. Battista, M. Patrignani, "IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnel discovery: methods and experimental results," IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 1, no. 1. April. 2004.
- K. Cho, M. Luckie, and B. Huffaker, "Identifying IPv6 Network Problems in the Dual-Stack World," SIGCOMM'04 Network Troubleshooting Workshop, Portland, USA, 2004.
- T. Sanguankotchakorn et al. , "Performance Evaluation of IPv6/IPv4 Deployment over Dedicated Data Links," Fifth International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing, 2005.
- Myung-Ki Shin et al. , "An Empirical Analysis of IPv6 Transition Mechanisms," Feb. 20-22, 2006, ICACT 2006.
- Xiaoming Zhou, Rob E. Kooij, Henk Uijterwaal, Piet Van Mieghem, "Estimation of Perceived Quality of Service for Applications on IPv6 Networks," PM²HW²N'06, October 6, 2006, Torremolinos, Malaga, Spain ACM 2006.
- The Network Simulator - ns, downloaded from http://www. isi. edu / nsnam/ns/
- "Mobiwan: ns-2 extensions to study mobility in Wide-Area IPv6 Networks", http://www. inrialpes. fr/planete/mobiwan